Kyleigh’s accident took place in 2006. There were three other passengers in the car. In 2006, the law for anyone with a provisional license stated that the driver could drive with family members plus one other person, and teens were prohibited to drive from 12:01am- 5:01am. The teen driver broke this rule the night of the accident. The boy driving had his brother, as well as 2 extra people in the car, one being Kyleigh. Kyleigh and the driver died instantaneously while the other two passengers were in critical condition.
(I feel I am stating my information backwards. I need to state the facts then claim my argument.)
Kyleigh's accident took place in 2006. In 2006 the law for anyone with a provisional license stated that the driver could drive with family members plus one other person and was prohibited to drive from 12:01am-5:01am. The driver Kyleigh was with however broke these rules. There were 4 people in the car, Kyleigh being one of them and the drivers brother being the other. That left the boy with one extra person than the rule stated. Laws were being broken on the site of the accident, however Kyleigh's mother still insisted on revising the law. There was no need to change the law, it was perfectly fine the way it was. Kyleigh and her friends broke the rules that were originally standing, other drivers should not be punished for this groups mishappening.
Kyleigh's accident took place in 2006. That same year, the law for anyone with a provisional license stated that the driver could drive with family members plus one other person and was prohibited to drive from 12:01am-5:01am. The driver Kyleigh was with, however, broke these rules. There were four people in the car, including Kyleigh, the driver's brother, and another non-family member. Despite this fact, Kyleigh's mother still insisted that the law be revised. However, one has to wonder whether the accident would have happened at all had the original law been observed. The mere fact that the law was broken in the process of the accident, calls into question any real need for the law to be changed, period.
ReplyDelete