Wednesday, November 17, 2010
Possible Topics
2. Blood Diamonds. I would discuss the issue & the immorality of the topic. See what is being done to prevent this process. New organizations have been formed to prevent Blood Diamonds from being distributed, ex. The Kimberly Process, an organization which monitors where diamonds came from, so that people can purchase diamonds from conflict free sources.
3. Disney Films. How they have played a roll in society. Hidden messages behind the films, how they influence Americans.
Ex. During WWII, Disney made propaganda films against the Nazis. Influencing Americans to become involved with the war.
Thursday, November 11, 2010
#11, Paragraph Revision
(I feel I am stating my information backwards. I need to state the facts then claim my argument.)
Kyleigh's accident took place in 2006. In 2006 the law for anyone with a provisional license stated that the driver could drive with family members plus one other person and was prohibited to drive from 12:01am-5:01am. The driver Kyleigh was with however broke these rules. There were 4 people in the car, Kyleigh being one of them and the drivers brother being the other. That left the boy with one extra person than the rule stated. Laws were being broken on the site of the accident, however Kyleigh's mother still insisted on revising the law. There was no need to change the law, it was perfectly fine the way it was. Kyleigh and her friends broke the rules that were originally standing, other drivers should not be punished for this groups mishappening.
Thursday, November 4, 2010
Kyleigh's Law... Not So Safe
“A Dangerous Law” by John Phalon
Not only are 17 year olds susceptible to danger, they are targeted out to police to. It is easier for police to pull over naive and new drivers opposed to older more experienced drivers. It makes them more inclined to receive tickets.
Phalon, John. "A Dangerous Law." NorthJersey. North Jersey Media Group, 4 Nov.
2010. Web. 4 Nov. 2010.
courts/safety/89658602_A_dangerous_law.html>.
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
#9, Argument
Four Loko’s are the newest and most dangerous alcoholic drink on the market. The drinks come in colorful cans and in many different flavors. They seem to be normal energy drinks, however they are 12% alcohol, and have lots of caffeine… about as much as a cup of coffee. Dr. Reihart states, “I’ve talked to parents who were shocked because the can was in their refrigerator and they didn’t realize it was an alcoholic beverage. It looks like every other energy drink out there.”
The drinks are heavily intoxicating and a cheap way to get drunk. The FDA is concerned that the bright colored cans, cheap price, and the fact that the drinks do not taste like alcohol is promoting Loko’s to underage drinkers.
One sorce claims, It’s a recipe for disaster because your body’s natural defense is to get sleepy and not want to drink, but in this case you’re tricking the body with the caffeine.” The drinks are causing many people to become hospitalized and experience black outs.
States, colleges, and facilities are looking to ban the drinks. So far, Ramapo College, in New Jersey, prohibits the drink. In addition, legislators around the U.S. are looking to prohibit the sale of Four Loko’s as well. Stricter rules should most likely come into play about this drink.
“You want flies with that? McDonald's Happy Meal shows no sign of decomposing after SIX MONTHS”
Sally Davies recently did an experiment that she entitled “The Happy Meal Project”. She bought a burger and fries from McDonalds and let them sit on her shelf for six months. Typically, food decomposes, grows mold, and rots after just a few weeks of sitting out.. however the Happy Meal took a path of its own.. this magical meal did not change after 6 months. There were no signs of rotting and not one speck of mold.
Should it be legal that McDonalds sell such disgusting, unhealthy, and I don’t even know what to call it food? I think not. The standards for McDonalds food should have to change. I see this as an extreme health issue.
McDonalds should not be allowed to sell meals like this. The bread did not even rot… How is this possible?
Legally Married Gay Man Faces US Deportation
Henry Valdina moved to America from Venezuela in 2002, and is currently married to a U.S. citizen, Joshua Vandiver. The couple has been together for four years and now it is time for Henry to renew his green card. Marriage, by U.S. law is a legitimate reason for a non-American person to remain in the country, however since Henry is gay, the court has ruled the validity of his case as unacceptable.
America is an extremely cruel place. "Trying to imagine me being separated from Josh is just -- it's like I see my world crumbling apart. We're in love." How can the court defy the case?
Henry came to America with nothing and is currently now stable. He is married and started his own dance studio in Princeton, NJ called HotSalsaHot. However, the American government does not seem to be sympathetic towards his situation.
If the law states that married couples can stay in the U.S. as long as one is an American citizen, then why is Henry being denied his citizenship? He should be treated just like any other individual. Henry is being deprived of his citizenship specifically because he is gay. This is not fair. America needs to re-think its values.
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
Old iPod Nano vs. the New
Old iPod Nano:
The older Nano is rectangular in shape and extremely thin. Each Nano comes in an awesome, bright, and bold color! Every color of the rainbow is available including black and gray. The screen, where the images are shown is long, and underneath is a round disk that allows you to navigate through the iPod. The round disk contains the words Menu, play/pause, forward, and back. On the back of the iPod there is a video camera, which allows you to record and take snapshots. This iPod is full of fun features and is easy to carry around because of its size. The Nano is extremely thin. The iPod is sleek and easy to use.
New Touch Screen Nano:
Since the previous Nano, there have been many new innovative design features added to this tiny and thin mp3. The Nano was always known for its colorful design and tiny figure, however this new Nano is the smallest one yet! It is nearly half the size of the older generation version. The Nano’s bold colors remain the same, however the shape and screen size shrunk. Now the Nano takes on a whole new look and form. It is smaller, takes on the shape of a square, and has a touch screen! No longer is there a big white disk with the features menu, play, forward, and back. The iPod allows you to navigate these options through the screen.
Sunday, October 10, 2010
Journal #7: Droid X vs. iPhone4
The new Verizon cell phone, the Motorola Droid X is in close competition with Apples new iPhone 4. “If Apple cannot resolve these iPhone 4 problems, unsure potential customers may move over to Motorola’s new Droid X as their communication device of choice.” (Harten). The Droid X, may be the phone to conquer all. The Droid X has many new features, some which even beat out the iPhone. There are plenty of games available, and awesome new applications and software that allow for the ultimate efficiency, organization, and fun! The iPhone currently has over 200,000 Apps available, unlike Apple’s iPhone, anyone can create new applications for the Droid X, so the options are endless. Soon, the Droid will be in close secession with the iPhone and its applications. Currently, the Droid X has 70,000 applications, which still is a whole lot of apps! In regard to the screen size, memory, and camera, the screen on the droid is bigger than the iPhone, they have equal memory compatibility; if you purchase an extra memory chip for the Droid, and the camera on the Droid is 8MP opposed to 5MP. Although the Droid’s screen size is bigger, 4.3 inch in comparison to 3.5 inch, the IPhone does in fact have a higher resolution. The iPhone contains special Retina Display technology, which enhances the image quality. Because the phone has Retina Display technology it can hold “326 pixels per square inch” (Watson & Writer). It seems that the Droid and iPhone are in close standing for each other. The operating systems are one of the few differences. The Droid runs on Google’s Android operating system and the iPhone runs off of Apple’s iOS4 system. Both phones have amazing features. They can even hook up to the television! When it comes to plugging the phone into the TV, the Motorola Droid does have an advantage. The Droid X is able to connect to HDMI cables, which means the image will be in high definition. The iPhone simply connects to AV cables; standard television cables. So which phone is better? Watson and Writer state, “the Droid versus iPhone debate is one of the greatest battles of our time”. Now that is impressive. The battery life on the iPhone is outstanding for a smart phone. Verizon has not yet released the exact battery life for the Droid X, however extension battery packs are available. It seems that the Droid X is the new iPhone for Verizon. The Droid X and iPhone are even the same price, $199 with a contract. The Droid X however does come with insurance, where as the iphone4 does not. If you misplace or damage your phone, Verizon insures another for free, where has Apple does not. Who wants to buy a whole new phone? It is pretty clear that the Droid X may be beating out the iPhone. The Droid has GPS, Wi-Fi, voice commands, as well as many other awesome and unique features. Who wouldn’t want this awesome phone?
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Journal #6 Investigative Report Outline
1. Opening Scene: On Sunday, September 20, 2009 Penn State freshman, Joe Dado, was reported missing after leaving a party at Phi Gamma Delta. His body was discovered the following evening around 6pm, from a repairman, outside of the Hosler Building. It was discovered that Joe had fallen 15 feet to his death. Soon after, police come across that alcohol was a factor in this atrocious casualty. However, did this sad start for Penn Staters result in any sort of change in campus regulations? Do Penn State students now realize the potential hazards of the overconsumption of alcohol and walking home alone?
2. Illustrative quote that will conclude your scene:
Zane: “I can’t drink for a while now.”
Me: “Why”
Zane: “This.” (Yellow sheet of paper, was charged with an underage.)
Well I guess, apparently not. Students each day are still becoming hospitalized, passing out, throwing up, and partaking in idiotic drunken acts.
3. Nut Graph: The University on the other hand has become stricter with drinking regulations. According to a Megan, an RA, “the rules for drinking have changed since Dado’s death. East never was a dry until this year. I am 21, so I would be able to have alcohol in my room. Now I cant. Anywhere there are freshman, there can’t be alcohol. They weren’t as strict last year”. It is however good to know that the University is taking a stance. Zane’s underage, as well as new regulations for dorms, show that Penn State is taking drinking more seriously.
4. Background: After Joe’s death Penn State is in fact becoming stricter with drinking. They have created new rules for RA’s as well as students and fraternities.
5. Supporting Information 1: “If you get caught throwing up in the bathroom, the RA’s automatically have to call the ambulance” –Megan, RA, age 21.
The school now takes the most direct approach with drinking. If you get caught, and are incoherent, the ambulance MUST come.
6. Supporting Information 2:
“Now frats have to make lists and they have to watch who can get in. We never had those security guys either. They have to make sure the frats are following the rules. They have to have an emergency number, a taxi, and drinks other than alcohol. The frats used to be chill. If you get caught, you have to go to a course and pay a fine.”- Paul, RA, age 20.
Currently, Fraternities are required to be rigorous with who they allow in. They must abide by harsher rules, and safety is now up there with having a good time. Security guards walk through the frats to make sure students are complying by the rules and partying in a safe manner.
7. Supporting Information 3:
“At first when I saw the security guards I thought they were police. It was scary. There were so many of them. They walk around carrying clipboards. They don’t do anything now they just make sure we are ok. It is the police who hide behind bushes that you have to watch out for.” –Ali, freshman, age 18
Ali affirms that there are a lot of security guards and policemen at night who watch out for students.
Supporting Information 4:
“It is scary for me to know that it is so easy to get an underage because for me, if I get one, I can not become a teacher.” Ali, freshman, age 18
Students are fearful about getting an underage; this can have positive and negative effects. Positive: hopefully students will be smarter about drinking. Negative: they will not want to ask for help when they need it.
8. Conclusion: Penn State students will not stop drinking, however it is good that the campus is making sure that students are being safe about drinking. Having security guards around truly does help. The arresting part and automatically calling the ambulance, does not help so much, because this will cause students to become fearful of asking for help when needed, however I do know that Penn State is doing their role when it comes to student safety.
Thursday, September 23, 2010
Journal #5 Investigative Report: Has Penn State become stricter after Dado's Death?
1) 1) The plot of my paper will be Penn State. I want to mainly focus on drinking in East Halls and in the frat houses because Dado was a freshman, and he did in fact leave a frat house, before he sadly passed away. The frat houses as well as east are filled with underage drinkers, and I would love to know how Penn State is attempting to handle the situation. East halls is filled with freshman, in Bigler, my building, there are about 65 freshman to a floor! I only have four floors, but most other buildings have twice as many floors! There are 14 freshman buildings. This leaves for thousands of freshman who could potentially be partaking in underage drinking. I do not expect drinking to stop, but I do hope that people are safe. Frat row is crazy as well. Teens fill the streets late at night as they walk from frat to frat. The houses are dark, packed, and loud, basically the perfect danger zone. People are always sloppily drunk, throwing up, and falling all over the place. Are these the proper party conditions? Personally, I know that teens are going to drink, but at home it was a lot safer. If a friend was ever sick, most of the time someone could always find a parent to help or a way to cover it up. Here, we can not do that. If a friend is getting sick, most of the time they get caught by the cops, or written up by an RA. The school should make a program that you can not get in trouble with the law or school if you get caught sick. We should have warnings before legally getting in trouble.
2)1) “Yeah, the rules for drinking have changed since Dado’s death. East never was a dry until this year. I am 21, so I would be able to have alcohol in my room. Now I cant. Anywhere there are freshman, there cant be alcohol. They weren’t as strict last year” –Megan, RA, age 21
“If you get caught throwing up in the bathroom, the RA’s automatically have to call the ambulance” –Megan, RA, age 21.
“Now frats have to make lists and they have to watch who can get in. We never had those security guys either. They have to make sure the frats are following the rules. They have to have an emergency number, a taxi, and drinks other than alcohol. The frats used to be chill. If you get caught, you have to go to a course and pay a fine.” –Paul, RA, age 20
Zane: “I can’t drink for a while now.”
Me: “Why”
Zane: “This.” (Yellow sheet of paper, was charged with an underage.)
-Zane, Freshman, 18
3)Fact#1: Dado’s death caused the University, IFC, and State College Borough to take serious looks at the way they handle alcohol abuse by students, and has resulted in significant policy changes from all three. (onwardstate.com)
Fact #2: resident Spanier announced to the Board of Trustees a 30-component strategy to curb the drinking problem. The policy includes mandatory alcohol training for all students treated for alcohol poisoning or cited for underage drinking, as well as the introduction of a responsible action protocol that keeps students who call for medical assistance from facing judicial affairs. In addition, IFC has altered its social policy to focus on education, allowing for fraternity members to take a class to become Greek Event Monitors for socials, as well as ID checks at the door and bans on Wednesday socials and away bars. The Commonwealth has also spoken up, with State Senator Jake Corman (R-Centre County) proposing increasing the fines for alcohol related offenses to $1000. (onwardstate.com)
Fact#3: The most noticeable difference is that professional bouncers are no longer required to work at each and every event. Instead, fraternity brothers (which can be from the chapter hosting the party) can undergo an IFC training program to be a certified Greek Event Monitor. Monitors are posted throughout the event, rather than just at the entrance and exit. Like bartenders, they will be required to be sober throughout the course of the night. In addition, the policy addresses the disconnection between guests invited and guests actually in attendance. (http://onwardstate.com/2010/08/30/new-ifc-social-event-policy-in-place/)
4) I would like to further investigate changes that have taken place with drinking on the Penn State campus. I want to learn more about the regulations that the school has now taken into play. My RA was saying that now, if they see someone getting sick they must automatically call the ambulance. This is not a good idea because students will then get in trouble with the police as well as the school. This discourages students from attaining medical help when needed. I want to also further investigate changes that took place with the Fraternities. Lastly, I also wonder if there have been more or less underage drinking citations since the new policies have been enforced.
Thursday, September 16, 2010
#1 Party School
I found the broadcast “#1 Party School”, by This American Life, to be hilarious and quite entertaining. Since I am a Penn Stater, I found myself able to relate to many of these issues; the tailgates, parties, academics. The investigators truly did capture the essence of a weekend at PSU, the frat life was right on target. Their descriptions, one-on-one confrontations with students, as well as quoting the president assisted in the vivid imagery portrayed throughout the broadcast. I could relate to everything from, “fratkets”, crazy tailgates, girls in ridiculously short skirts and heels that look like they could break ankles, the “drunk bus” breaking out in song, and experiences on frat row. Two weekends ago, I saw a girl “discreetly” peeing in, what she thought to be a bush, directly on frat row! The amount of drunken teens here is insane! As a matter of fact, the girl was wearing a skirt and high heels to. On few occasions, I have seen girls in heels fall flat on their faces, I have seen multiple people walk into poles, fall out of the busses, Oh, and fall face first into bushes. The first description of the Frat houses was hilarious “the thick muck covering the floor”, he couldn’t have described it better. The frat houses are sticky and sweaty, people dance, the windows ARE covered with garbage bags, and it is quite disgusting. The frats sort of make you feel like you are in a dirty club.
Although drinking may be fun, and the stories are hilarious, it can be dangerous. The university cannot stop it, but there are ways to regulate the drinking and keep it safe. They describe drinking to be something that brings us together in this Happy Valley. They interview tailgaters who claim that, “it is just something to do”. The investigative reporters depict how drinking is fun but many students drink way over the top. They discuss the drunken escapades of teens making the students sound idiotic and ridiculous, which sort of puts drinking in a new perspective.
Students drink, and do not think of the repercussions of their actions. The investigators continue to discuss how the issue of drinking affects different students around the campus. They quote President, Graham Spanier’s issues with cleaning up the mess to the Publicity and Alumni that the students here at PSU create. The investigators even talk to a boy who had to quit a frat because he was falling behind with his academics. This, however shows that some teens are smart about drinking and not all live by the alcoholic and barbaric stereotypes that go along with this school. The ingestions truly capture the essence of PSU nightlife and parties, however they effectively portray the dangers of drinking as well. The broadcast does an excellent job doing this by later flipping the mood around by talking about Joe Dado’s death. I feel discussing the death showed how harmful and hazardous drinking truly can be. It made students reevaluate if they actually want that “#1 Party School” title. The baggage that comes along with such a title is one that may be to much to handle. Death is a serious matter, especially when tied in with drinking. Whose fault is it? The school for allowing the drinking to occur? The frat for allowing this boy to drink too much? Drinking in this instance, is a HUGE problem on campus. We know it can not be stopped, but a better look out could be beneficial. This instance completely altered the mood of the investigative report, and changed the “woo-hoo!” emotion of the partying title to something sorrowful and regretful.
The investigators do a great job capturing the essence of Penn State, but what I also liked is that in the end, they made a valid point about drinking and what it means to hold that title. The investigators truly found a lot of information to back up the point they were trying to make.
Thursday, September 9, 2010
"Shitty First Drafts"
Lamott’s piece shows us how important “shitty first drafts” are. It is normal to have a first draft be all over the place, one just has to know how to fix it. A first draft is a way to get all of your ideas onto paper. It is not supposed to be organized or well written and it is usually a sloppy mess. It is a way to get your ideas onto the paper. They may seem not so important because of their lack of order and perfection, however First drafts, are crucial because this draft will be the basis of the final outcome. Lamott’s story reassured me that I am able to write a good paper. Writing an A paper takes time as well as trail and error. A paper must be treated with care and revised over and over again. Typically I become worried when writing a first draft, because I am afraid that my paper will not make any sense and won’t have the proper flow. However, all of these mistakes are necessary in order to have a decent paper. I learned that you must take the good pieces of your first draft and use and organize them in a way that they will work with the final. It is all about organization and getting your ideas straight. A crappy first draft is completely normal. The more ideas, the better the outcome. It is ok for the first draft to be sloppy, it is allowed to start at point A and finish at point Z because in the end the writer has many more ideas to work with.
A first draft is the basis of a final. You just have to let your fingers type and ideas as they flow out of your head. Afterwards is when you can efficiently piece the puzzle together and have your words make sense. You can create outlines and such in order to become organized with your works. Lamott gives very helpful advice because it made me put into perspective how truly important the first draft is. The first draft is written for marking up, tweaking, and scribbling all over. It is the foundation of your works. Just like a house needs a sturdy foundation, so does your paper. The first draft is the framework. As the house gets built; the walls are put into place and the flooring is laid down, your paper gets reorganized and words are assembled differently. This continues to happen until it is time for the finishing touches, the paint, decorations, etc. This is the final draft, the smaller things, making sure the words make sense and every last detail is in place. Writing a paper is a cumulative process. It takes a lot of time and effort. The more you revise, the better your paper will be. I completely agree with the point Lamott was trying to get across.
Monday, August 30, 2010
My Addicted Son Response
The touching story, “My Addicted Son” by David Sheriff, is full of intense emotion. The story reaches out to teens and parents, informing them about how hazardous, horrific, and detrimental drugs are. David’s son, Nick’s, drug addiction, impacted not only Nick, but his entire family as well. By taking drugs, Nick ruined his future. Instead of attending college, for many years, Nick was checking himself in and out of rehabilitation centers. His frequent arrests and hospital visits worried not only his parents, but his younger siblings as well. Nick clearly was not the proper role model for his two younger siblings. Nick lies and steals from his younger brother and sister causing them to feel pain and fear. The author’s story contains a lot of emotion, which helps the audience connect with his words. The most prominent emotions portrayed through the story are pain, sorrow, and empathy. He captures these emotions with his vivid imagery. In one part he describes Nick’s skin as “rice-papery and gaunt, and his hair was like a field, with smashed-down sienna patches and sticking-up yellowed clumps, a disaster left over from when he tried to bleach it.” The reader gets a sense of Nick’s sickly and frail look, inflicting emotions of hurt and sadness. As a reader, I wanted to reach out and help Nick. I wanted to help him realize how awful drugs are. Not only does the reader feel bad for Nick, she/he also feels distress for David as well. No father should have to watch his son go through such a thing. David is constantly taking the blame for his son’s issues. The repetitive dialogues throughout the story also help to portray the sorrowful essence, because the reader becomes involved in the family’s relationship. The most moving part of the story was the ending, when David reads Nick’s letter to his little brother, Jasper. In closed is the $8 that he stole earlier in the story. The conclusion of this story is very touching. The fact that Nick was in and out of rehabilitation centers, having difficulties with relapses, and in the end he overcomes his issues, really makes this story touching and uplifting. The author tells his story in order to create an essence of hope. He wants to spread his story to families, teens, and anyone who has a drug addiction. He wants the public to be aware of his son’s story so he can make people feel optimistic about their futures. This story also warns people about how bad drugs are and how destructive they can be to not only ones body, but family, and life all together. This story conveys a lot of emotion and hurt. We sympathize for the family for David, and Nick. David’s descriptions of Nick’s loss of identity and self-destruction truly convey David’s sorrow and hurt for his son. This story is definitely moving and motivating. It teaches how bad drugs are. This story was very touching, and it did bring me to tears. I am so happy that Nick is not giving up hope, and I do wish him and his family the best of luck. I hope he can continue staying clean, and live a long happy life.